dc.contributor.advisor |
Corazza, Marco |
it_IT |
dc.contributor.author |
Finocchiaro, Andrea <1990> |
it_IT |
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-02-10 |
it_IT |
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-05-04T11:46:47Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-07-03T13:56:00Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016-03-08 |
it_IT |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10579/8070 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This thesis describes and analyze critically some financial portfolio models, in partcular the 1/N model, the Mean-Variance optimization model and the Minimum Variance model.
To asses their performances , it has been replicated the experiment proposed in the article "Optimal versus naive diversification: how inefficient is the 1/N portfolio startegy?" written by Victor DeMiguel,Lorenzo Garlappi and Raman Uppal, with a different criteria of the estimation window used in order to evaluate the performances of the three different strategies . |
it_IT |
dc.language.iso |
|
it_IT |
dc.publisher |
Università Ca' Foscari Venezia |
it_IT |
dc.rights |
© Andrea Finocchiaro, 2016 |
it_IT |
dc.title |
Portfolio rebalancing: comparing naive and classical strategies |
it_IT |
dc.title.alternative |
|
it_IT |
dc.type |
Master's Degree Thesis |
it_IT |
dc.degree.name |
Economia e finanza - economics and finance |
it_IT |
dc.degree.level |
Laurea magistrale |
it_IT |
dc.degree.grantor |
Dipartimento di Economia |
it_IT |
dc.description.academicyear |
2014/2015, sessione straordinaria |
it_IT |
dc.rights.accessrights |
embargoedAccess |
it_IT |
dc.thesis.matricno |
830842 |
it_IT |
dc.subject.miur |
|
it_IT |
dc.description.note |
|
it_IT |
dc.degree.discipline |
|
it_IT |
dc.contributor.co-advisor |
|
it_IT |
dc.provenance.upload |
Andrea Finocchiaro (830842@stud.unive.it), 2016-02-10 |
it_IT |
dc.provenance.plagiarycheck |
Marco Corazza (corazza@unive.it), 2016-02-22 |
it_IT |