Portfolio rebalancing: comparing naive and classical strategies

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Corazza, Marco it_IT
dc.contributor.author Finocchiaro, Andrea <1990> it_IT
dc.date.accessioned 2016-02-10 it_IT
dc.date.accessioned 2016-05-04T11:46:47Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-03T13:56:00Z
dc.date.issued 2016-03-08 it_IT
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10579/8070
dc.description.abstract This thesis describes and analyze critically some financial portfolio models, in partcular the 1/N model, the Mean-Variance optimization model and the Minimum Variance model. To asses their performances , it has been replicated the experiment proposed in the article "Optimal versus naive diversification: how inefficient is the 1/N portfolio startegy?" written by Victor DeMiguel,Lorenzo Garlappi and Raman Uppal, with a different criteria of the estimation window used in order to evaluate the performances of the three different strategies . it_IT
dc.language.iso it_IT
dc.publisher Università Ca' Foscari Venezia it_IT
dc.rights © Andrea Finocchiaro, 2016 it_IT
dc.title Portfolio rebalancing: comparing naive and classical strategies it_IT
dc.title.alternative it_IT
dc.type Master's Degree Thesis it_IT
dc.degree.name Economia e finanza - economics and finance it_IT
dc.degree.level Laurea magistrale it_IT
dc.degree.grantor Dipartimento di Economia it_IT
dc.description.academicyear 2014/2015, sessione straordinaria it_IT
dc.rights.accessrights embargoedAccess it_IT
dc.thesis.matricno 830842 it_IT
dc.subject.miur it_IT
dc.description.note it_IT
dc.degree.discipline it_IT
dc.contributor.co-advisor it_IT
dc.provenance.upload Andrea Finocchiaro (830842@stud.unive.it), 2016-02-10 it_IT
dc.provenance.plagiarycheck Marco Corazza (corazza@unive.it), 2016-02-22 it_IT


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record