Will Next Generation EU require a change in the European Economic Constitution?

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Minto, Andrea it_IT
dc.contributor.author Liviero, Edoardo <1994> it_IT
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-12 it_IT
dc.date.accessioned 2021-07-21T08:05:02Z
dc.date.available 2021-07-21T08:05:02Z
dc.date.issued 2021-04-26 it_IT
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10579/19184
dc.description.abstract The economic crises triggered by the pandemic COVID-19 is deep and it does not seem on the verge of a resolution. The European Central Bank is playing a central role in assisting the Eurozone economy towards a recovery, with the objective of creating a strong European economy more resilient and sustainable. Among the many legal instruments the ECB is deploying, ‘Next Generation EU’ is object of a complex debate between the EU members. NGEU, according to what was established by the European Commission, has a total endowment of 750 billion euros, distributed to members of the Eurozone, a portion in the form of a grant, as a sort of non-repayable loans, for a total of approximately 312 billion; and a portion distributed in the form of loans, at extremely favorable conditions, equal to approximately 360 billion in total. The governance of the fund will be entrusted to the EC, as the governing body of the Union, but also to a collegial body, which thus guarantees a greater impartiality with respect to the evaluation of projects and their implementation. However, no member state will be able to veto the allocation of funds and their management; but it will be possible, for each country, to substantially ask for a stop period in the disbursement in order to raise concerns about the projects and the use of funds by asking for detailed clarifications on the merits of the individual areas of intervention. In previous years, similar instruments like the European Stability Mechanism, the Outright Monetary Transactions Program and the Public Sector Purchase Program have been heavily criticized because they, supposedly, went against the Treaty of Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty of the European Union. However, each trial concluded with the European Court of Justice ruling in favor of the above-mentioned instruments, suggesting that a new perspective or paradigm may be necessary in order to rethink the European Economic Constitution. The last aim would be to allow European Authorities, for example the ECB, to be more effective in implementing policies with the mere scope to support the European Economy and benefit European citizens. it_IT
dc.language.iso en it_IT
dc.publisher Università Ca' Foscari Venezia it_IT
dc.rights © Edoardo Liviero, 2021 it_IT
dc.title Will Next Generation EU require a change in the European Economic Constitution? it_IT
dc.title.alternative Will Next Generation EU require a change in the European Economic Constitution? it_IT
dc.type Master's Degree Thesis it_IT
dc.degree.name Economia e finanza it_IT
dc.degree.level Laurea magistrale it_IT
dc.degree.grantor Dipartimento di Economia it_IT
dc.description.academicyear 2019-2020, sessione straordinaria LM it_IT
dc.rights.accessrights openAccess it_IT
dc.thesis.matricno 853762 it_IT
dc.subject.miur IUS/14 DIRITTO DELL'UNIONE EUROPEA it_IT
dc.description.note it_IT
dc.degree.discipline it_IT
dc.contributor.co-advisor it_IT
dc.date.embargoend it_IT
dc.provenance.upload Edoardo Liviero (853762@stud.unive.it), 2021-04-12 it_IT
dc.provenance.plagiarycheck Andrea Minto (andrea.minto@unive.it), 2021-04-26 it_IT


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record